NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Buona sera Umberto,
These results are well because Tim's design is very good.
Grazie mille per la tua finezza, Joan.
These results are well because Tim's design is very good.
Grazie mille per la tua finezza, Joan.
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Hi.
It's just a thought.
JG.
It's just a thought.
JG.
- Attachments
-
- comHD.png (47.02 KiB) Viewed 11125 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Some results more. JG.
- Attachments
-
- zet tau_20191227.png (15.44 KiB) Viewed 11124 times
-
- Mira_20191228.png (29.78 KiB) Viewed 11124 times
-
- HD352_20191228.png (50.15 KiB) Viewed 11124 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Hello,
Two observations more.
JG.
Two observations more.
JG.
- Attachments
-
- Z AND_20191228.png (15.29 KiB) Viewed 11056 times
-
- 43ORI_20191230.png (16.36 KiB) Viewed 11056 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Hi,
Three more.
J.G.
Three more.
J.G.
- Attachments
-
- _axper_20200115.png (13.45 KiB) Viewed 10901 times
-
- HF39357_20200115.png (17.39 KiB) Viewed 10901 times
-
- _V694Mon_20200115.png (18.11 KiB) Viewed 10901 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Details around V694 Mon.
JG.
JG.
- Attachments
-
- _694 mon40524354.png (14.71 KiB) Viewed 10876 times
-
- _694 mon48405498.png (14.07 KiB) Viewed 10876 times
-
- _694 mon58556690.png (14.32 KiB) Viewed 10876 times
-
- _694 mon82178764.png (15.17 KiB) Viewed 10876 times
-
- _694 mon89249175.png (14.62 KiB) Viewed 10876 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Rigel,
JG.
JG.
- Attachments
-
- _rigel_20200117a.png (17.82 KiB) Viewed 10835 times
-
- _rigel_20200117b.png (12.56 KiB) Viewed 10835 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Hi,
The Moon at last night through fog and clouds. It was impossible observe any star.
Echelle NOU_T with aluminized mirrors result.
The Order #56 it's seems been consolidated.
J.G.
The Moon at last night through fog and clouds. It was impossible observe any star.
Echelle NOU_T with aluminized mirrors result.
The Order #56 it's seems been consolidated.
J.G.
- Attachments
-
- Lluna_20200208a.png (32.7 KiB) Viewed 10500 times
-
- Lluna_20200208b.png (23.72 KiB) Viewed 10500 times
-
- Lluna_20200208c.png (18.74 KiB) Viewed 10500 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Hello,
In my opinion, the Noct-NIKKOR 58mm. F1.2 is usable for spectrofraphic jobs, it isn't as better as the Nikon 85mm. F1.8, or rather, they are two different things.
I would like to remember that the Noct is a old objective with an aspherical lens and only were made around 13000 units until 1997. See, https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/58.htm. From my point of view, the Noct as the best objective with a notable difference as others ones 50 to 58mm. for a reflex cameras. Nowadays they're designing new very good objectives but for mirrorless bodies, I don't know how I could use them with their short back focus, another deterrence point is their price, around €9000 for a Nikon 58mm f/0.95, with 17 lenses, three of them aspherical, total weight 2 kg.
Well, I leave he some pictures, you can see a Check2 and four results, I would like to add that if you would like to observe with full resolution the ordes IR and UV, you only need to bring to focus these ones, and that it's all, in this way you can detected the Order 57 in some ocassion. I think it's good see the IR and UV zones, although being at low resolution now.
About the not appersement of the Orders 30, 29, 28, 27,..., it is due that ISIS can't discrimene them, because they are really too near. It could be fix, first, with a new CCD with pixels around 6x6, ( I don't hae any of it ), and/or second with change the equilateral prism for a 300 l/mm. transmision grating.
With the Noct I've reduced to halve the integration times and suppose I've won a magnitude. In fact I be able to observe the main spectral zones for the most part of studies.
J.Guarro.
In my opinion, the Noct-NIKKOR 58mm. F1.2 is usable for spectrofraphic jobs, it isn't as better as the Nikon 85mm. F1.8, or rather, they are two different things.
I would like to remember that the Noct is a old objective with an aspherical lens and only were made around 13000 units until 1997. See, https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/58.htm. From my point of view, the Noct as the best objective with a notable difference as others ones 50 to 58mm. for a reflex cameras. Nowadays they're designing new very good objectives but for mirrorless bodies, I don't know how I could use them with their short back focus, another deterrence point is their price, around €9000 for a Nikon 58mm f/0.95, with 17 lenses, three of them aspherical, total weight 2 kg.
Well, I leave he some pictures, you can see a Check2 and four results, I would like to add that if you would like to observe with full resolution the ordes IR and UV, you only need to bring to focus these ones, and that it's all, in this way you can detected the Order 57 in some ocassion. I think it's good see the IR and UV zones, although being at low resolution now.
About the not appersement of the Orders 30, 29, 28, 27,..., it is due that ISIS can't discrimene them, because they are really too near. It could be fix, first, with a new CCD with pixels around 6x6, ( I don't hae any of it ), and/or second with change the equilateral prism for a 300 l/mm. transmision grating.
With the Noct I've reduced to halve the integration times and suppose I've won a magnitude. In fact I be able to observe the main spectral zones for the most part of studies.
J.Guarro.
- Attachments
-
- NOU_58_6.png (169.72 KiB) Viewed 9811 times
-
- NOU_58_7.png (17.63 KiB) Viewed 9811 times
-
- NOU_58_8.png (41.54 KiB) Viewed 9811 times
-
- NOU_58_9.png (50.46 KiB) Viewed 9811 times
-
- NOU_58_10.png (26.93 KiB) Viewed 9811 times
-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: NEW NOU_T ECHELLE RESULTS
Hello at all,
These two last nights I've tested the NOU_58 with one 40 microns pinhole. The theoretical resolutions has been about 10000. But it is a bit far of the reality. The matter is, the orders narrowless add the inclination of these ones referent to horitzontal lines of pixels in the CCD chip, the resulut of this is noise and a possible graphic distorsion.
You know the rule that says that the division the pinhole or slit size per the pixel's size no be able to inferior to 3. This rule working well when the spectral image is paralel to pixel lines but not when are between their ones a strong inclination.
In this case, 40 / 9.08 = 4.4, but that isn't sufficent. I've returned again to 50 / 9.08 = 5.5, the noise efect, and stability improve, certainly the R fall down to 8500 but it is compensed with 64% to more light.
With the NOU_58 we are looking for a more weak objects. The main surprise is the current R8500, all of us thought that it had be around of R6000/7000.
J. Guarro.
These two last nights I've tested the NOU_58 with one 40 microns pinhole. The theoretical resolutions has been about 10000. But it is a bit far of the reality. The matter is, the orders narrowless add the inclination of these ones referent to horitzontal lines of pixels in the CCD chip, the resulut of this is noise and a possible graphic distorsion.
You know the rule that says that the division the pinhole or slit size per the pixel's size no be able to inferior to 3. This rule working well when the spectral image is paralel to pixel lines but not when are between their ones a strong inclination.
In this case, 40 / 9.08 = 4.4, but that isn't sufficent. I've returned again to 50 / 9.08 = 5.5, the noise efect, and stability improve, certainly the R fall down to 8500 but it is compensed with 64% to more light.
With the NOU_58 we are looking for a more weak objects. The main surprise is the current R8500, all of us thought that it had be around of R6000/7000.
J. Guarro.
- Attachments
-
- _PCYGADD.png (112.62 KiB) Viewed 9765 times
-
- Halpha soroll.png (21.84 KiB) Viewed 9765 times