Hi,
Just arrived in the Observatory and the first thing I did was to change from 23µ slit to the 35µ slit in my LISA.
Then I started to shoot 6 images of 600 seconds on WR 134 and then I went to HD 16523. Later I will post some results.
and here a screenshot of the star in the guiding software
Tomorrow I will post HD 16523 images
Thanks for reading and looking
2011-12-15
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm
2011-12-15
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
-
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:01 pm
- Location: Rouen
- Contact:
Re: 2011-12-15
Hello Rainer,
This seems very correct
You have to do is calculate a good instrumental response
For the record:
http://astrosurf.com/buil/survey/wrstars/wrstars.html
http://www.astronomie-amateur.fr/Projet ... _Lisa.html
(I see that Christian has taken the lead on the atlas)
Best regards
François
This seems very correct
You have to do is calculate a good instrumental response
For the record:
http://astrosurf.com/buil/survey/wrstars/wrstars.html
http://www.astronomie-amateur.fr/Projet ... _Lisa.html
(I see that Christian has taken the lead on the atlas)
Best regards
François
François Teyssier
http://www.astronomie-amateur.fr
http://www.astronomie-amateur.fr
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm
Re: 2011-12-15
Hi Francois,
Thanks for your comments. Here is my WR 134 treated with a CCD Response and compared to Christian Buil's profile (Blue)
Thanks for your comments. Here is my WR 134 treated with a CCD Response and compared to Christian Buil's profile (Blue)
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm
Re: 2011-12-15
Hi,
As noted down I also made HD 16523 which now I know is WR4, Yesterday night I did not find that description, that is why I put WRXXX
Image of the spectrum, profile comparison to Christian's profile and a screenshot from the guide camera
One interesting exercise was comparing 2 series of images. The first series was 6x 600s = 1 hour and the next series was 2x 1800s = 1hour, see image below.
Thanks for reading and looking
As noted down I also made HD 16523 which now I know is WR4, Yesterday night I did not find that description, that is why I put WRXXX
Image of the spectrum, profile comparison to Christian's profile and a screenshot from the guide camera
One interesting exercise was comparing 2 series of images. The first series was 6x 600s = 1 hour and the next series was 2x 1800s = 1hour, see image below.
Thanks for reading and looking
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
-
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2011-12-15
Hello Rainer,
Excellent run !
(you use ISIS for the processing ?)
Christian
Excellent run !
(you use ISIS for the processing ?)
Christian
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm
Re: 2011-12-15
Hi Christian,Christian Buil wrote:Hello Rainer,
Excellent run !
(you use ISIS for the processing ?)
Christian
Thanks for the flowers
No, unfortunately I am not yet so far as too use ISIS. This was processed in RSpec
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
-
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2011-12-15
No problem - it is your choice !
Try to compute difference (or ratio) of the two spectra (my and your) for detect possible evolution.
Note some possible spectral calibration error near blue-green region (LISA is not very simple to calibrate with
precision).
Christian
Try to compute difference (or ratio) of the two spectra (my and your) for detect possible evolution.
Note some possible spectral calibration error near blue-green region (LISA is not very simple to calibrate with
precision).
Christian