2011-12-15

On line discussions about observations and so on (even for cloudy nights !)
Post Reply
Rainer Ehlert
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm

2011-12-15

Post by Rainer Ehlert »

Hi,

Just arrived in the Observatory and the first thing I did was to change from 23µ slit to the 35µ slit in my LISA.

Then I started to shoot 6 images of 600 seconds on WR 134 and then I went to HD 16523. Later I will post some results.
WR134-006-600s-median.jpg
WR134-006-600s-median-graph.jpg
WR134-006-600s-median-graph.jpg (180.42 KiB) Viewed 6161 times
and here a screenshot of the star in the guiding software
WR134-001-600s-guide.jpg
WR134-001-600s-guide.jpg (296.61 KiB) Viewed 6161 times
Tomorrow I will post HD 16523 images

Thanks for reading and looking
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
Francois Teyssier
Posts: 1521
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:01 pm
Location: Rouen
Contact:

Re: 2011-12-15

Post by Francois Teyssier »

Hello Rainer,
This seems very correct
You have to do is calculate a good instrumental response
For the record:
http://astrosurf.com/buil/survey/wrstars/wrstars.html
http://www.astronomie-amateur.fr/Projet ... _Lisa.html

(I see that Christian has taken the lead on the atlas)

Best regards
François
Rainer Ehlert
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm

Re: 2011-12-15

Post by Rainer Ehlert »

Hi Francois,

Thanks for your comments. Here is my WR 134 treated with a CCD Response and compared to Christian Buil's profile (Blue)
WR134-006-600s-median-BuilvsEhlert.jpg
WR134-006-600s-median-BuilvsEhlert.jpg (228.14 KiB) Viewed 6145 times
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
Rainer Ehlert
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm

Re: 2011-12-15

Post by Rainer Ehlert »

Hi,

As noted down I also made HD 16523 which now I know is WR4, Yesterday night I did not find that description, that is why I put WRXXX :oops:

Image of the spectrum, profile comparison to Christian's profile and a screenshot from the guide camera
WRXXX-HD16523-002-1800s-median.jpg
WRXXX-HD16523-002-1800s-median-BuilvsEhlert.jpg
WRXXX-HD16523-002-1800s-median-BuilvsEhlert.jpg (214.46 KiB) Viewed 6145 times
WRXXX-HD16523-001-600s-guide.jpg
WRXXX-HD16523-001-600s-guide.jpg (308.53 KiB) Viewed 6145 times
One interesting exercise was comparing 2 series of images. The first series was 6x 600s = 1 hour and the next series was 2x 1800s = 1hour, see image below.
WRXXX-HD16523-002-600s-vs-1800s.jpg
WRXXX-HD16523-002-600s-vs-1800s.jpg (241.7 KiB) Viewed 6143 times


Thanks for reading and looking
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
Christian Buil
Posts: 1431
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: 2011-12-15

Post by Christian Buil »

Hello Rainer,

Excellent run !
(you use ISIS for the processing ?)

Christian
Rainer Ehlert
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:36 pm

Re: 2011-12-15

Post by Rainer Ehlert »

Christian Buil wrote:Hello Rainer,

Excellent run !
(you use ISIS for the processing ?)

Christian
Hi Christian,

Thanks for the flowers :oops:

No, unfortunately I am not yet so far as too use ISIS. This was processed in RSpec :oops:
regards Rainer____Observatorio Real de 14_____MÉXICO_____N 22° W 101°
Christian Buil
Posts: 1431
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: 2011-12-15

Post by Christian Buil »

No problem - it is your choice !
Try to compute difference (or ratio) of the two spectra (my and your) for detect possible evolution.
Note some possible spectral calibration error near blue-green region (LISA is not very simple to calibrate with
precision).

Christian
Post Reply