Hi all,
The profile does not give any evidence of eclipse of VV Cep. Did we need to re-calculate the theoretical model & some certain parameters?
Cheers,
Dong
profile of 8-04
profile of 8-04
- Attachments
-
- 8-04.png (30.13 KiB) Viewed 7628 times
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:16 pm
Re: profile of 8-04
Hi Dong,
Graczyk et al. wrote in IBVS No. 4679:
The most surprising feature of the eclipse 1997-98 is the disargreement between the observed time of mid-eclipse and the predicted time based on Gaposchkin´s (1937) ephemeris. The O-C diagram for the orbital orbital period of the VV Cep system.
The O-C of 1997/98 eclipse obviously indicates a sudden large change in the orbital period between the last two minima. The ephemeris gives JD 2450790 for the mid-eclipse time, while the observations clearly show that it occurred at around JD 2450855. This means that the mid-eclipse occurred 65 d later than expected from the ephemeris.
There are two probable reasons for such event:
1. Period changes due to mass transfer between the components, or
2. mass ejection from the VV Cep sytem, if one accepts the medium mass model for VV Cep, with the mass of the M star about 2.5 solar masses and of the B star about 8 solar masses
My references to the beginning of the eclipse are based on the orbital elements of VV Cep by K. O. Wright (1977) at R.A.S.C. Jour., Vol. 71, No. 2.
I think we have to be patiently ... it comes, but question is when.
Ernst
Graczyk et al. wrote in IBVS No. 4679:
The most surprising feature of the eclipse 1997-98 is the disargreement between the observed time of mid-eclipse and the predicted time based on Gaposchkin´s (1937) ephemeris. The O-C diagram for the orbital orbital period of the VV Cep system.
The O-C of 1997/98 eclipse obviously indicates a sudden large change in the orbital period between the last two minima. The ephemeris gives JD 2450790 for the mid-eclipse time, while the observations clearly show that it occurred at around JD 2450855. This means that the mid-eclipse occurred 65 d later than expected from the ephemeris.
There are two probable reasons for such event:
1. Period changes due to mass transfer between the components, or
2. mass ejection from the VV Cep sytem, if one accepts the medium mass model for VV Cep, with the mass of the M star about 2.5 solar masses and of the B star about 8 solar masses
My references to the beginning of the eclipse are based on the orbital elements of VV Cep by K. O. Wright (1977) at R.A.S.C. Jour., Vol. 71, No. 2.
I think we have to be patiently ... it comes, but question is when.
Ernst
-
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:35 am
- Location: Rhône Alpes FRANCE
- Contact:
Re: profile of 8-04
Yes, I confirm... No more evolution since my last spectrum taken the 28th july.
Here's a comparison between 28th July and 4th August (corrected from heliocentrique velocity).
And the full spectrum
Here's a comparison between 28th July and 4th August (corrected from heliocentrique velocity).
And the full spectrum
LHIRES III #5, LISA, e-Shel, C14, RC400 Astrosib, AP1600
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
Re: profile of 8-04
Well, let's be patient to catch the big fish...
Thank you, Ernst for your explanation.
Dong
Thank you, Ernst for your explanation.
Dong
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: profile of 8-04
Dear colleagues,
As I already proposed on July 7th on the BAA forum it is quite possible the eclipse could be later.
According to the work of Leedjärv et.al. (A&A 1999) it seems the orbital period has a tendency of increasing between the eclipses due to a possible mass transfer or mass ejection. (Estimation approximately 1% per two former eclipses).
Link to the eclipse Ernst referred to:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1999A%26A...349..511L
So we must be standby
Kind regards,
Marc.
As I already proposed on July 7th on the BAA forum it is quite possible the eclipse could be later.
According to the work of Leedjärv et.al. (A&A 1999) it seems the orbital period has a tendency of increasing between the eclipses due to a possible mass transfer or mass ejection. (Estimation approximately 1% per two former eclipses).
Link to the eclipse Ernst referred to:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1999A%26A...349..511L
So we must be standby
Kind regards,
Marc.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:16 pm
Re: profile of 8-04
Dear Marco,
many thanks for this helpful supplement.
Ernst
many thanks for this helpful supplement.
Ernst
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 10:31 am
Re: profile of 8-04
A clear night here in the UK and a quick spectrum shows no significant changes.
My fits file won't load !
Regards to all.
Jack
Essex UK
My fits file won't load !
Regards to all.
Jack
Essex UK