How to observe the disk eclipse
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:09 pm
Olivier Thizy sent me spectra of µ Cep and VV Cep, in order to see, what result a division (VV through µ) would produce.
But as a first step I compared both (instr. resp. corr.) spectra with Planck temperature curves. As we can see, the µ Cep continuum slope fits at the best between 2500 to 3000 K, and for VV Cep between 3000 to 3500 K. If we consider the temperature uncertainties in literature, these results do fit very well. The next consideration was, whether a division of VV Cep by µ Cep for this spectral section is really meaningful.
I think, not really. The question is, what could we expect by that?
My opinion is that the result of this division delivers more or less the spectral features of the accretion disk (Halpha, Hbeta & Hgamma), but very strongly overlaid by the continuum flux of the super giant. In order to observe step by step the process of the eclipse, until the accretion disk is totaly disappeared, we should take the wavelength section below 4000 A until 3800 A, as it was done by James Foster (Los Angeles). The advantage of this spectral section would be that we would (by division of VV Cep to µ Cep) measure hardly flux portions of the M super giant, but more or less strongly dominant the higher Balmer lines until to H10!!!! of the disk.
While the entire disk eclipse we would have the rare opportunity, starting with the disappearance of the disk line Halpha until to Balmerline H10 and the corresponding time marks, to analyse the disk extension.
The first indicator of the beginning of the disk eclipse will be the decreasing of the Halpha EW (first contact), because this emission line represents the outer diameter of the accretion disk.
Comments are welcome!!
Ernst Pollmann
But as a first step I compared both (instr. resp. corr.) spectra with Planck temperature curves. As we can see, the µ Cep continuum slope fits at the best between 2500 to 3000 K, and for VV Cep between 3000 to 3500 K. If we consider the temperature uncertainties in literature, these results do fit very well. The next consideration was, whether a division of VV Cep by µ Cep for this spectral section is really meaningful.
I think, not really. The question is, what could we expect by that?
My opinion is that the result of this division delivers more or less the spectral features of the accretion disk (Halpha, Hbeta & Hgamma), but very strongly overlaid by the continuum flux of the super giant. In order to observe step by step the process of the eclipse, until the accretion disk is totaly disappeared, we should take the wavelength section below 4000 A until 3800 A, as it was done by James Foster (Los Angeles). The advantage of this spectral section would be that we would (by division of VV Cep to µ Cep) measure hardly flux portions of the M super giant, but more or less strongly dominant the higher Balmer lines until to H10!!!! of the disk.
While the entire disk eclipse we would have the rare opportunity, starting with the disappearance of the disk line Halpha until to Balmerline H10 and the corresponding time marks, to analyse the disk extension.
The first indicator of the beginning of the disk eclipse will be the decreasing of the Halpha EW (first contact), because this emission line represents the outer diameter of the accretion disk.
Comments are welcome!!
Ernst Pollmann