QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Show your spectra, your results ...
JP Nougayrede
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 8:33 pm

Re: QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Post by JP Nougayrede »

We have good weather in Southern France, I recorded a spectrum of APM 08279+5255 last night to examine the broad absorption features.

Robin, how did you extract the spectra from the PS1-ELQ catalogue ?

Jean-Philippe
Robin Leadbeater
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:41 pm
Contact:

Re: QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Post by Robin Leadbeater »

JP Nougayrede wrote:
Robin, how did you extract the spectra from the PS1-ELQ catalogue ?

Jean-Philippe
I am not sure where they are available in digital form. I just overlaid the images of the spectra from the Schindler et al papers.


Cheers
Robin
LHIRES III #29 ATIK314 ALPY 600/200 ATIK428 Star Analyser 100/200 C11 EQ6
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
JP Nougayrede
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 8:33 pm

Re: QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Post by JP Nougayrede »

Ok, thanks Robin.

Here is the classic lensed broad absorption quasar APM 08279+5255 yesterday night with a standard Alpy and T200 Newton near downtown Toulouse
APM_20210413T192753.png
APM_20210413T192753.png (74.34 KiB) Viewed 5462 times
With a quick reduction in Demetra (could optimize in Isis ?), the spectrum is too noisy to clearly see broad absorption systems in the lyman forest. Nor the lyman break.

Funily, a quick spectrum with a star analyser on a T600 under dark skies (Pic du Midi) produced a better result
https://www.webastro.net/uploads/imagep ... f36440.jpg
https://www.webastro.net/uploads/imagep ... 3fe017.jpg

The Lyman break is clearly visible on your spectra of the quasars at z 4.4 and 4.5. Again, very nice & impressive results Robin !
Christian Buil
Posts: 1431
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Post by Christian Buil »

Robin, your observations of these distant quasars are fantastic. It is an achievement and it must raise enthusiasm!

Your magnificent work inspired me to make an observation with the Star'Ex spectrograph (3D-printing) of the quasar J1654436, but unfortunately with a more modest telescope (8-inch Newton) and a terribly polluted sky (French Cote d'Azur):

Image

At the top the spectrum of the nova Cas 2021 observed the same night, in the middle the spectrum of the quasar + pollution, at the bottom the remote sky. The Lyman alpha spectrum is detected at the very limit (because presence of the photon noise - street light pollution + moon light).

Star'Ex use a 300 g/mm grating + 23 microns slit + ASI183MM CMOS camera (CMED algorithm for the processing).

The quasar is not visible on the guide camera image (here a ASI290 Mini 60 seconds exposure) - the sky magnitude is estimated to 16/arcsec:

Image

(the position relative to the slit is only estimated during guiding).

The setup:

Image

Note that Sol'Ex / Star'Ex instrument allows to observe both the Sun at magnitude -26.7 and a distant quasar at magnitude 19 ;-)

Image

(Sol'Ex image taken the 22 April 2021)

Christian Buil
Robin Leadbeater
Posts: 1926
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:41 pm
Contact:

Re: QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Post by Robin Leadbeater »

Christian Buil wrote:Robin, your observations of these distant quasars are fantastic. It is an achievement and it must raise enthusiasm!

The Lyman alpha spectrum is detected at the very limit (because presence of the photon noise - street light pollution + moon light).
Thanks Christian,

For you to detect anything is remarkable in your conditions. It is good that the redshift was enough to push Ly alpha out of the worst light pollution. It is funny to think that perhaps you would not see anything if the quasar was nearer. :lol: (Z=3.8 would put Ly alpha in the sodium light pollution band)

Cheers
Robin
LHIRES III #29 ATIK314 ALPY 600/200 ATIK428 Star Analyser 100/200 C11 EQ6
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
Christian Buil
Posts: 1431
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: QSO PS1J161737_595020 at z=4.3

Post by Christian Buil »

Robin, this is absolutely correct, a closer quasar would not have been visible because of the pollution!

Another magic thing: the quasar is impossible to see from my observatory in direct imagery, but visible with a spectrograph (it is not intuitive for beginners!).

Christian
Post Reply