I have been using ISIS to process my flare star spectra. I need to process some 80 or so spectra so have been using the @pro# products to give the individual spectra.
However, I find the @pro1 product is scaled differently to the rest. To test this I copied the same image 3 time and made them into a sequence i.e. they were all identical.The attached image show the @pro1 product compared to @pro2. You get the same result with @pro3 and 4.
Regards Andrew
ISIS @pro products issue?
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:23 pm
Re: ISIS @pro products issue?
I find the latest version does not normalise the @pro# products and the unnormalised product are as expected so the problem is "solved".
Regards Andrew
Regards Andrew
-
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISIS @pro products issue?
Hi Andrews,
That's right. This allows a better comparison of the relative flux in a sequence and absolute calibrations. But I admit that this does not facilitate comparisons.
Note the existence of the L_NORM command to normalize a sequence between two wavelengths. Example:
>L_NORM IN- OUT- 14 6620 6640
Christian
That's right. This allows a better comparison of the relative flux in a sequence and absolute calibrations. But I admit that this does not facilitate comparisons.
Note the existence of the L_NORM command to normalize a sequence between two wavelengths. Example:
>L_NORM IN- OUT- 14 6620 6640
Christian