
The equatorial mount is a little overdimensioned ...
Who says small telescope says possibility to use a narrow slit. Of course the optical flux is limited by the small aperture, but in return, the resolution power increases (it is a choice).
Tests by using 10 microns wide slit on Vega, with R = 1450 at 550 nm (and R = 1700 at Halpha wavelength) and a 300 l/mm grating + ASI183MM for the visual spectral domain coverage:

The slit wide on the sky is only 1,37 arcsec. If we adopt a 14 microns slit the angular wide is 1,92 arcsec. The resolution power drop now to R=1200 at 550 nm (R=1400 near Halpha) :

The Be star QR Vul:

Symbiotic AG Peg ;


Of course, no question of take spectra of the magnitude 15 objects with such a small instrument (!!!), however here, the "bright" actual cataclysmic star in Cygnus near magnitude 9.5 - 9.75 by using a 10 microns slit :

or by using a 14 microns slit (+ a processing method here adapted to oversampled spectra --- the ASI183MM pixel size is only 2.4 microns --- for reduce the noise ("nearly" equivalent to a 2x2 binning)) :

I really enjoy doing this type of spectrography with a small telescope and a (relatively) low cost spectrograph. This seems to me coherent (it does not exclude other configurations, of course).
It is very specific to spectrography: the product (radiometric resolution i.e. SNR) X (spectral resolution power) result is nearly a constant. If we sacrifice the magnitude, we gain is in spectral resolution power increase.That's what makes science (and education) with very small instruments.
Christian Buil