Hello Christian,
I would like to use the flux calibration feature in ISIS using V mag but I need to know more about how it works and what assumptions are made.
It appears to use the flux measured at one wavelength in the spectrum (5556A) but V magnitude depends on the integrated flux over the passband of the V filter . What happens if 5556A lies on an emission or absorption line?
Thanks
Robin
ISIS - flux calibration using visual magnitude
-
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:41 pm
- Contact:
ISIS - flux calibration using visual magnitude
LHIRES III #29 ATIK314 ALPY 600/200 ATIK428 Star Analyser 100/200 C11 EQ6
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
-
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISIS - flux calibration using visual magnitude
For erg/cm2/s/A conversion I compute:
C1 = 10.0 ^ ( -0.4 * V_magnitude - 8.449)
COEF = C1 / MEASURED_SIGNAL
MEASURED_SIGNAL is the signal measured in your spectrum in numerical count near 5556 A wavelength
(more precisely I compute the mean signal in a range of +/-2 spectral sample around
the nearest 5556 A pixel sample).
All points of your spectrum ar multiplied by COEF
S_ASBOLUTE = S_OBERSERVED x COEF
For W/m2/A the conversion equation is:
C2 = 10.0 ^ ( -0.4 * V_magnitude - 11.449)
COEF = C2 / MEASURED_SIGNAL
Of course the presence of line in the +/-2 pixel sample range
can be a problem. My recommandation is to interpollate
the spectrum near 5550 A for erase accidental lines before
flux conversion.
Christian
C1 = 10.0 ^ ( -0.4 * V_magnitude - 8.449)
COEF = C1 / MEASURED_SIGNAL
MEASURED_SIGNAL is the signal measured in your spectrum in numerical count near 5556 A wavelength
(more precisely I compute the mean signal in a range of +/-2 spectral sample around
the nearest 5556 A pixel sample).
All points of your spectrum ar multiplied by COEF
S_ASBOLUTE = S_OBERSERVED x COEF
For W/m2/A the conversion equation is:
C2 = 10.0 ^ ( -0.4 * V_magnitude - 11.449)
COEF = C2 / MEASURED_SIGNAL
Of course the presence of line in the +/-2 pixel sample range
can be a problem. My recommandation is to interpollate
the spectrum near 5550 A for erase accidental lines before
flux conversion.
Christian
-
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: ISIS - flux calibration using visual magnitude
Thanks Christian,
Do you have a reference I can quote for the Vmag to flux at 5556A conversion factor?
Cheers
Robin
Do you have a reference I can quote for the Vmag to flux at 5556A conversion factor?
Cheers
Robin
LHIRES III #29 ATIK314 ALPY 600/200 ATIK428 Star Analyser 100/200 C11 EQ6
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:16 pm
- Location: Maienfeld, Switzerland
Re: ISIS - flux calibration using visual magnitude
Hi Robin,
a good introduction to spectrophotometry you find here:
http://www.astro.virginia.edu/class/oco ... 14-f03.pdf
It looks however that it is based on a different photometric system (Bessell vs. Johnson). This also shows some of the complexity of these standards.
Regards, Martin
a good introduction to spectrophotometry you find here:
http://www.astro.virginia.edu/class/oco ... 14-f03.pdf
It looks however that it is based on a different photometric system (Bessell vs. Johnson). This also shows some of the complexity of these standards.
Regards, Martin