Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:11 am
Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
R.A. 10h24m02.89s, Decl. +48°08'51.2" (J2000.0)
2019 May 25.4972 UT, 11.8 mag (CCD, unfiltered)
Discoverer: Tadashi Kojima (Gunma-ken, Japan)
9 mag amplitude
More details here:
https://www.aavso.org/tcp-j102402894808 ... ursa-major
Spectra are welcome.
Cheers.
M. Verlinden
2019 May 25.4972 UT, 11.8 mag (CCD, unfiltered)
Discoverer: Tadashi Kojima (Gunma-ken, Japan)
9 mag amplitude
More details here:
https://www.aavso.org/tcp-j102402894808 ... ursa-major
Spectra are welcome.
Cheers.
M. Verlinden
-
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:26 am
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
si ça peut aider un champ de l'objet.
Pas le ciel pour moi pour la faire...
Pas le ciel pour moi pour la faire...
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:35 am
- Location: Rhône Alpes FRANCE
- Contact:
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
With Pascal Le Dû, we are on the target, but not a good weather in Southern France (many clouds)
LHIRES III #5, LISA, e-Shel, C14, RC400 Astrosib, AP1600
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:35 am
- Location: Rhône Alpes FRANCE
- Contact:
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
Only one exposure of 600s for this object with bad weather condition (clouds)

So, we don't think it's a Nova .....With bad weather condition, it may have a doubt about the correct positioning of the target, but this is the only star that we can see in the field of view of our guiding CCD with the right magnitude.

So, we don't think it's a Nova .....With bad weather condition, it may have a doubt about the correct positioning of the target, but this is the only star that we can see in the field of view of our guiding CCD with the right magnitude.
LHIRES III #5, LISA, e-Shel, C14, RC400 Astrosib, AP1600
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
-
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:26 am
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
Bonjour Olivier,
Bravo pour le spectre. C'est curieux qu'est ce qui expliquerait cette baisse de magnitude ?
Bravo pour le spectre. C'est curieux qu'est ce qui expliquerait cette baisse de magnitude ?
-
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
Looks like a dwarf nova from the spectrum. (Hot continuum, weak broad Balmer absorption. H alpha very weak/filled with emission?). At mag 12 the progenitor should have been visible in deep images though ?
Robin
EDIT: just looked at the AAVSO reference. There is a probable mag 19 progenitor so ~mag 7 increase, consistent with a dwarf nova
Robin
EDIT: just looked at the AAVSO reference. There is a probable mag 19 progenitor so ~mag 7 increase, consistent with a dwarf nova
LHIRES III #29 ATIK314 ALPY 600/200 ATIK428 Star Analyser 100/200 C11 EQ6
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:35 am
- Location: Rhône Alpes FRANCE
- Contact:
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
here's Steve's comment on the interpretation of our spectrum :
"This looks like a WD with, perhaps, some emission (Halpha), very little extinction (if any) and a very hot system. The He I lines are weak but there, at least some (4471, 5876, it takes imagination to see 6678), no He II 4686,5411, and otherwise nothing that seems out of the ordinary for a weak cataclysmic. If the emission were stronger I might say it's a polar (or AM Her) but this is definitely not a nova. There's some asymmetry on the Balmer profiles that could be real but, again, nothing particular. If this is an active system, it might have shown some mass loss outburst but there's nothing particular here. Nice spectrum!"
"This looks like a WD with, perhaps, some emission (Halpha), very little extinction (if any) and a very hot system. The He I lines are weak but there, at least some (4471, 5876, it takes imagination to see 6678), no He II 4686,5411, and otherwise nothing that seems out of the ordinary for a weak cataclysmic. If the emission were stronger I might say it's a polar (or AM Her) but this is definitely not a nova. There's some asymmetry on the Balmer profiles that could be real but, again, nothing particular. If this is an active system, it might have shown some mass loss outburst but there's nothing particular here. Nice spectrum!"
LHIRES III #5, LISA, e-Shel, C14, RC400 Astrosib, AP1600
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
http://o.garde.free.fr/astro/Spectro1/Bienvenue.html
-
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
Yes, given the progenitor it was unlikely to be a classical nova. (Patrick Schmeer's AAVSO alert was for probable DWARF NOVA, not a nova.) The alert would have been better posted in the cataclysmic variables alert section. Perhaps it can be moved there ?
Cheers
Robin
Cheers
Robin
LHIRES III #29 ATIK314 ALPY 600/200 ATIK428 Star Analyser 100/200 C11 EQ6
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk
-
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:26 am
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
Un spectre tout frais, on dirait qu'il y a un début de raies d'émission ?
Est ce réel ou est ce du bruit ?

Est ce réel ou est ce du bruit ?

-
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 11:26 am
Re: Possible Nova in UMa Mag 11.8
Bonsoir,
Un peu plus de poses sur cet objet :

Un peu plus de poses sur cet objet :
